Confronto: Consumo combinato (WLTP) Mazda CX-30 vs. concorrenti 2025

CX-30 DM 2019

Indice dei contenuti:

Mazda CX-30 - Qual è il consumo combinato (wltp) dei diversi motori?

Motori di Mazda CX-30

(Consumo combinato (WLTP))
Motori di Mazda CX-30
MotoreConsumo combinato (WLTP)
SKYACTIV-D 1.8 85 kW5 l/100km
e-SKYACTIV-G 2.0 M Hybrid 90 kW5 l/100km
e-SKYACTIV-G 2.0 M Hybrid 150 110 kW5 l/100km
e-SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid 132 kW5 l/100km
e-SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid 137 kW5 l/100km
SKYACTIV-D 1.8 SKYACTIV-Drive 85 kW6 l/100km
e-SKYACTIV-G 2.0 M Hybrid SKYACTIV-Drive 90 kW6 l/100km
2.5 e-SKYACTIV-G 140 Prime-Line {automatic} 103 kW6 l/100km
2.5 e-SKYACTIV-G 140 Prime-Line 103 kW6 l/100km
e-SKYACTIV-G 2.0 M Hybrid 150 SKYACTIV-Drive 110 kW6 l/100km
e-SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid SKYACTIV-Drive 132 kW6 l/100km
e-SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid SKYACTIV-Drive 137 kW6 l/100km
1. SKYACTIV-D 1.8 85 kW 5 l/100km
2. e-SKYACTIV-G 2.0 M Hybrid 90 kW 5 l/100km
3. e-SKYACTIV-G 2.0 M Hybrid 150 110 kW 5 l/100km
4. e-SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid 132 kW 5 l/100km
5. e-SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid 137 kW 5 l/100km
6. SKYACTIV-D 1.8 SKYACTIV-Drive 85 kW 6 l/100km
7. e-SKYACTIV-G 2.0 M Hybrid SKYACTIV-Drive 90 kW 6 l/100km
8. 2.5 e-SKYACTIV-G 140 Prime-Line {automatic} 103 kW 6 l/100km
9. 2.5 e-SKYACTIV-G 140 Prime-Line 103 kW 6 l/100km
10. e-SKYACTIV-G 2.0 M Hybrid 150 SKYACTIV-Drive 110 kW 6 l/100km
11. e-SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid SKYACTIV-Drive 132 kW 6 l/100km
12. e-SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid SKYACTIV-Drive 137 kW 6 l/100km

Il consumo combinato (wltp) rispetto ad altri modelli Mazda

Mazda CX-30 vs altre auto attuali della Mazda

(Consumo combinato (WLTP))
Consumo combinato (WLTP): CX-30 vs. altri modelli della Mazda
Nome varianteConsumo combinato (WLTP)
CX-60 e-Skyactiv PHEV Prime-Line AWD {automatic} 241 kW1 l/100km
CX-80 e-Skyactiv PHEV Exclusive-Line AWD {automatic} 241 kW1 l/100km
2 Hybrid Pure CVT 85 kW3 l/100km
2 e-SKYACTIV-G 115 M Hybrid Exclusive-Line 85 kW4 l/100km
3 Fastback 2.0 e-SKYACTIV-X 186 Center-Line 137 kW5 l/100km
CX-30 e-SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid 137 kW5 l/100km
3 2.0 e-SKYACTIV-X 186 Center-Line 137 kW6 l/100km
6 Kombi Kombi SKYACTIV-G 145 Exclusive-Line 107 kW6 l/100km
6 {sedan} Kombi SKYACTIV-G 145 Exclusive-Line 107 kW6 l/100km
CX-5 e-SKYACTIV-G 194 Exclusive-Line SKYACTIV-Drive 143 kW6 l/100km
MX-5 RF RF SKYACTIV-G 132 Homura 97 kW6 l/100km
MX-5 Roadster RF SKYACTIV-G 132 Homura 97 kW6 l/100km
CX-3 SKYACTIV-G 150 Kangei AWD 110 kW6 l/100km
MX-30 e-SKYACTIV R-EV Prime-Line 125 kW19 l/100km
1. CX-60 e-Skyactiv PHEV Prime-Line AWD {automatic} 241 kW 1 l/100km
2. CX-80 e-Skyactiv PHEV Exclusive-Line AWD {automatic} 241 kW 1 l/100km
3. 2 Hybrid Pure CVT 85 kW 3 l/100km
4. 2 e-SKYACTIV-G 115 M Hybrid Exclusive-Line 85 kW 4 l/100km
5. 3 Fastback 2.0 e-SKYACTIV-X 186 Center-Line 137 kW 5 l/100km
6. CX-30 e-SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid 137 kW 5 l/100km
7. 3 2.0 e-SKYACTIV-X 186 Center-Line 137 kW 6 l/100km
8. 6 Kombi Kombi SKYACTIV-G 145 Exclusive-Line 107 kW 6 l/100km
9. 6 {sedan} Kombi SKYACTIV-G 145 Exclusive-Line 107 kW 6 l/100km
10. CX-5 e-SKYACTIV-G 194 Exclusive-Line SKYACTIV-Drive 143 kW 6 l/100km
11. MX-5 RF RF SKYACTIV-G 132 Homura 97 kW 6 l/100km
12. MX-5 Roadster RF SKYACTIV-G 132 Homura 97 kW 6 l/100km
13. CX-3 SKYACTIV-G 150 Kangei AWD 110 kW 6 l/100km
14. MX-30 e-SKYACTIV R-EV Prime-Line 125 kW 19 l/100km

Come si confronta il consumo combinato (wltp) del Mazda CX-30 con i suoi concorrenti più vicini?

Mazda CX-30 vs. auto simili

(Consumo combinato (WLTP))
Consumo combinato (WLTP): Mazda CX-30 vs. auto simili
Modello autoConsumo combinato (WLTP)
DS Automobiles DS 7 BlueHDi 130 20225 l/100km
Peugeot 2008 1.2 PureTech 100 20235 l/100km
Suzuki S-Cross 1.4 Boosterjet Hybrid 20225 l/100km
Mazda CX-30 1.8 SKYACTIV-D 20195 l/100km
KIA Sorento 2.2 CRDi 20246 l/100km
VW Tayron 2.0 TDI SCR 20256 l/100km
Toyota C-HR 1.2 T 20196 l/100km
KIA Sportage 1.6 T-GDI 20226 l/100km
Opel Grandland 1.2 DI Turbo 20226 l/100km
KIA XCeed 1.0 T-GDI 20226 l/100km
Renault Austral Mild Hybrid 140 20226 l/100km
SEAT Ateca 1.0 TSI 20206 l/100km
Ford Kuga 1.5 EcoBoost 20196 l/100km
VW T-Roc 1.0 TSI OPF 20226 l/100km
Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBoost ST 20206 l/100km
SsangYong Tivoli 1.5 GDI-T 20197 l/100km
1. DS Automobiles DS 7 BlueHDi 130 2022 5 l/100km
2. Peugeot 2008 1.2 PureTech 100 2023 5 l/100km
3. Suzuki S-Cross 1.4 Boosterjet Hybrid 2022 5 l/100km
4. Mazda CX-30 1.8 SKYACTIV-D 2019 5 l/100km
5. KIA Sorento 2.2 CRDi 2024 6 l/100km
6. VW Tayron 2.0 TDI SCR 2025 6 l/100km
7. Toyota C-HR 1.2 T 2019 6 l/100km
8. KIA Sportage 1.6 T-GDI 2022 6 l/100km
9. Opel Grandland 1.2 DI Turbo 2022 6 l/100km
10. KIA XCeed 1.0 T-GDI 2022 6 l/100km
11. Renault Austral Mild Hybrid 140 2022 6 l/100km
12. SEAT Ateca 1.0 TSI 2020 6 l/100km
13. Ford Kuga 1.5 EcoBoost 2019 6 l/100km
14. VW T-Roc 1.0 TSI OPF 2022 6 l/100km
15. Ford Puma 1.5 EcoBoost ST 2020 6 l/100km
16. SsangYong Tivoli 1.5 GDI-T 2019 7 l/100km

Auto simili

Renault Koleos
Consumo combinato (WLTP):
-100% (0 l/100km)


Confronta
DS Automobiles DS 7
Consumo combinato (WLTP):
0% (5 l/100km)


Confronta
KIA Sorento
Consumo combinato (WLTP):
+20% (6 l/100km)


Confronta
VW Tayron
Consumo combinato (WLTP):
+20% (6 l/100km)


Confronta
Skoda Karoq
Consumo combinato (WLTP):
-100% (0 l/100km)


Confronta
Toyota C-HR
Consumo combinato (WLTP):
+20% (6 l/100km)


Confronta
Renault Captur
Consumo combinato (WLTP):
-100% (0 l/100km)


Confronta
Peugeot 2008
Consumo combinato (WLTP):
0% (5 l/100km)


Confronta

Compare with ...

TOPlist